PHD Writers US

Essay on Internal Environmental Analysis

We write papers for students

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.

Get Help Now!

Essay on Internal Environmental Analysis

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

Essay on Internal Environmental Analysis

 

Internal Environmental Analysis

1

 

Internal Environmental Analysis

8

Internal Environmental Analysis

Introduction

The purpose to this analysis is to review Compass Group’s internal environment, research and point out the organization’s weaknesses and strengths to include the current used resources. Identify the vital internal environmental factors in the general, industry, and external analysis in relation to the internal analysis and perform a competitor analysis. This analysis will also assess the structure of the organization and the influence this has on its performance and determine the organization’s competitive position and the possibilities this provides. Compass Group USA provides foodservice and support services to corporate cafeterias, arenas, museums, award winning restaurants and other related organizational needs (“Who We Are”, 2017).  Compass Group has been around for over 75 years and it continues to grow each day (“Who We Are”, 2017). Although it is an international company providing services in over 50 countries and over 50,000 locations, the U.S. branch began in 1994.

Internal Environment

Compass Group is made up of several elements in the food industry market sectors to include Business, Healthcare, Education, Sports and Defense (Food is Our Passion 2017).  The organization provides solutions that offer mutual value to the client as well as the organization and still stay cost effective. Currently, Compass Group operates in more than 50 countries with over 50,000 clients (Food is Our Passion 2017).  Compass group employs over 500,000 employees and takes pride in serving over 5 billion meals per year. Paul Walsh joined Compass Group in 2014 as the Chairman. Followed by several executives such as Richard Cousins, Dominic Blakemore, Johnny Thomson and eight others helping him run the many sectors that compose the organization. Compass Group corporate culture is described as “Acting Responsibly”. A major focus of this organization is the commitment to enforce that the welfare of the farm animals used in their global supply falls under “Responsible Sourcing Strategy” (Food is Our Passion 2017).  These types of commitments bring back to focus in employee behavior. The importance of having an enthusiastic team is what brings the passion to the clients and also opening doors to employees to advance within the organization with possibilities in over 50 countries.

Important Strengths and Weaknesses

Compass Group like most organizations has strengths as well as weaknesses. A major strength for Compass Group is that it is listed in the London Stock Exchange and the Financial Times Stock Exchange 100 Index which supports their continuous growth, but also helps the shareholders feel motivated about their investments and the employees know that they are part of a well financial driven organization (Compass Group Swot Analysis, Usp & Competitors, 2017).  Because it has been around for over 75 years, this is an excellent example of their strengths as it helps the image of the company with great history behind its processes and robust financial position (Compass Group Swot Analysis, Usp & Competitors, 2017).  Another major strength is the quantity of employed individuals currently running over 500,000 and growing. These amount of employees create many positive effects, from great talent to a ton of input, which Compass Group uses as it listens to its employees ideas.

It is considered a world leader in food and support services and continues to grow in emerging markets. But with strengths sometimes organizations face some down fall. One weakness that was very public was the allegations by the United Nations about bribery in UN Contracts (Kundnani, 2006). It settled two lawsuits for 40 million pounds with the two competitors that claimed losses over 600 million pounds. Another weakness that has put a dent in their ability to entitlement of best services was the claim by Canadian prisons that their food services was way below food good quality which in turn affected their brand image. One of the claims by the prisoners was that they were being served raw eggs and that equipment was down all the time (Collins, 2016).

Internal & External Environmental Factors

Compass Group has some external factors that affect its growth, image and production. One external factor is the importance of growing the organic business. Although it is growing incrementally, its venture in continuing as a world leader in the food industry it’s important to be sustainable in all areas possible to include recyclable programs. Another example of external factor that Compass Group has encounter is the power of media as they encounter bumps in their growth. Because of previous issues with the UN and claims of breviary to get special contracts, the recovery and cleanup of organizations image is crucial to the continuous growth. However, the internal factors that build from the external efforts are much greater in strengthening the organization’s image and encouraging the employees to be motivators and enthusiastic. Innovation in food creation and improvement in support services has kept Compass Group as the world leader in the shared market. The organization surveys its employees and listens to its clients. It grows because their commitment to their investment in their internal factors and the dedication to keep external factors under control and well supported.

Competition

Dun & Bradstreet list three major competitors in the market share as Sodexo, Inc., Aramark, and Delaware North Companies Inc (“Compass Group USA, Inc. Competition”, 2017). These companies, like Compass Group, offer food and support services its clients. The clients include corporations, healthcare, long term care, schools, colleges, government facilities, and many types of retirement homes. The services are very similar as well and include food services, facilities management, linen and housekeeping (“Compass Group USA, Inc. Competition”, 2017).

Structure and Performance

Compass Group corporate responsibility is to provide the best and highest quality service to its clients. Promoting safety is top priority for its employees, clients and the end consumer because this builds trust and people are attracted to the highest rated talent. Stakeholder responsibility to Dow Jones, British Safety Council and the UN Global Compact are just examples of their commitment to structure and work partnerships building by developing policies and best practices. Compass Group is made up of many companies.

In the U.S., some of these companies are Bon Appetit, Canteen, Wolfgang Puck and many others. It is structure to cover Business and Industry, Education, Healthcare, Sports and Entertainment, Vending, and Remote Sites. Compass Group is also a leader in Restaurants and Purchasing and has strategic partners such as Thompson Hospitality Corp. Compass Group runs operations in more than 50 countries with over 50,000 customers (Food is Our Passion 2017).  In July 26, 2017, Compass Group release the third quarter report which list its performance with a 3.9% growth in organic revenue as a whole and 7.1% in the U.S. and the continuous commitment to generating efficiencies in the management and performance program (“Third Quarter Update”, 2017).

Competitive Position

Compass Group covers many different areas of support and food services. As the organization continue to grow, it must keep in mind that competitors will fight for more market share space and will try to use any negative media information as a selling point to new clients. The organization has work very hard to accomplish the expansion into many countries, and is very successful at retaining clients. The target will continue to be the ability to reach as many food and support service clients with a global reach but keeping in mind the importance of local touch.

Conclusion

Understanding how internal and external factors can affect the performance as well as the client retention is key to the organizations continuous growth. Many opportunities are available to maintain, such as keeping all companies in federal and state standards, but also global requirements. Investing in employees and generating positive work environments will keep the company whole. Innovation and growing sustainability internally but also promoting it externally with its partners are fundamental to the growth in the global supply. The commitment to provide the highest quality to all customer including all support services along with focusing constant efforts to make a difference in the market share will grow the confidence in the client list and any possible new businesses.

References

Compass Group Mission & Vision. (2017). Retrieved from

http://www.compass-usa.com/mission-vision/

Compass Group Swot Analysis, Usp & Competitors. (2017). Retrieved from

http://www.mbaskool.com/brandguide/tourism-and-hospitality/13436-compass-group.html

Compass Group Usa, Inc. Competition. (2017). Retrieved from

http://www.hoovers.com/company-information/cs/competition.compass_group_usa_inc.f0f3a19d658a40fa.html

Collins, C. (2016). The cost of privatized food in public institutions. Retrieved from

The cost of privatized food in public institutions

Food is Our Passion. (2017). Retrieved from

https://www.compass-group.com/en/

Kundnani, H. (2006). Compass settles claims of bribery in UN contracts. Retrieved from

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2006/oct/17/3

Third Quarter Update. (2017). Retrieved from

https://www.compass-group.com/content/dam/compass-group/corporate/Investors/Results-presentations/2017/Q3TradingUpdate/Q3%20Trading%20Update%202017%20FINAL.pdf.downloadasset.pdf

Who We Are. (2017). Retrieved from

https://www.compass-group.com/en/who-we-are.html

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.

GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER

CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow

Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

The Post Essay on Internal Environmental Analysis first appeared on PHD Writers US and is written by admin