Examine the variables that comprise Agency Theory

Examine the variables that comprise Agency Theory

Order ID	53003233773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

Examine the variables that comprise Agency Theory

Discussion

We write papers for students

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.

Get Help Now!

Discuss one interesting future research topic related to RBV or agency theory, or the combination of both.

MY NOTES: Discussion OUTCOME

• Examine the variables that comprise Agency Theory view.
• Identify examples of future research using Agency Theory.

Note

RBV= Resource Base View

Work cited and References

150 Words

=============================================================

Here is my preview problem statements if it can be useful.

EXAMPLE OF MY PROBLEM STATEMENT FROM SLP4:

About a study concerning the utilization of chronic illness preventive measures, among university students.

My two comments of two Problem Statements:

1)  An innovation is an idea, practice, or object that is perceived to be new by an individual or other unit of adoption such as teams, groups, or departments (Rogers, 1995). To be an innovation, the ideas must add value to the organization. They may lead to new or improved products, services, systems, or work procedures. The ability to be innovative is critical in every industry in order to adapt to changing technologies and working conditions, to come up with new products, to take on new skills and jobs, and to stay competitive (Russel, 1990). Innovation is subject to influences from the individual, the organization, and the environment (Slappender, 1996). Historically, innovation in organizations has been studied primarily from the organization’s point of view (Damanpour, 1991, 1996; Gifford, 1992). Research has focused on the improvement of structure, structural relationships, networking, and categorization of types of organizations.                                                                                       2) Leaders are the engines for envisioning and creating innovative products and services in organizations (Reeves-Ellington, 1998). In the quest to develop leaders, workplace learning and performance professionals can research and apply programs to foster innovation.  The attributes of effective innovation leaders can be monitored and analyzed and company climates conducive to innovation can be benchmarked and emulated (Kalliath, 2002). Commitment to innovation as a culture is prevalent in organizations as it is commonly woven directly into mission statements. However, leaders still lack the ability to plan, measure, and implement innovative products and services. These challenges are exacerbated by the pressures to manage several different and often conflicting roles. The competencies that underpin these roles can be explored and developed by workplace learning and performance professionals.

References

Rogers, E (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.

Russel, R. D. (1990). Innovation in organizations: Toward an integrated model. Review of Business, 12(2), 19-28.

Slappendel, C. (1996). Perspectives on innovation in organizations. Organization Studies, 17(1), 107-130.

Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42(5), 693-717.

Gifford, S. (1992). Innovation, firm size and growth in a centralized organization. The Rand Journal of Economics, 23(2), 284-299

Reeves-Ellington, R. (1998). Leadership for socially responsible organizations. Leadership & Organization Development, 19(2), 97-105.

 

Kalliath, T. (2002). Innovations in teaching organization development and change: Pedagogical constructs and tools for training for training reflective practitioners. Organization Development Journal, 20(3), 1-4.

AGENCY THEORY

Required Reading

Argote, L., & Greve, H. R. (2007). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm – 40 years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organization Science, 18(3), 337-349. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0280

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory – an assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74. doi: 10.2307/258191

Shapiro, S. P. (2005). Agency theory Annual Review of Sociology (Vol. 31, pp. 263-284).

Bahli, B; Rivard, S (2003). The information technology outsourcing risk: a transaction cost and agency theory-based perspective. Journal of Information Technology. Volume: 18   Issue: 3 Pages: 211-221   Published: Sep 2003

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1988). Agency-theory and institutional-theory explanations – the case of retail sales compensation. Academy of Management Journal   Volume: 31   Issue: 3 Pages: 488-511   Published: Sep 1988

Optional Reading

Hill, C., Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies   Volume: 29   Issue: 2   Pages: 131-154   Published: Mar 1992

Gomezmejia, L. R.; Balkin, D. B. (1992). Determinants of faculty pay – an agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal   Volume: 35   Issue: 5 Pages: 921-955   Published: Dec 1992

Tosi, H. L., Gomezmejia, L. R. (1989). The decoupling of CEO pay and performance – an agency theory perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly   Volume: 34   Issue: 2 Pages: 169-189   Published: Jun 1989

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Examine the variables that comprise Agency Theory

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Why Work With Us!!

• Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.

• We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.

• High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.