Preventing disease and promoting health

Preventing disease and promoting health

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

preventing disease and promoting health

We write papers for students

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.

Get Help Now!

Healthy People 2020 is a framework to assist communities in preventing disease and promoting health. Search the scientific literature and find a research study related to one of the focus areas identified by Healthy People 2020.

In a 750-1200-word essay, critically appraise the study by answering each of the following questions:

What is the study question and is it relevant?

Does the study add anything new?

What type of research question is being asked?

Was the study design appropriate for the research question?

Did the study methods address the most important potential sources of bias?

Was the study performed according to the original protocol?

Does the study test a stated hypothesis? If so, what is it?

Does the data justify the conclusions?

Are there any conflicts of interest?

There are methodological points to consider in appraising literature that are specific to cross-sectional, cohort, case-control, clinical trials, and case studies. Based on the design of this study, what are the key methodical points to consider?

A minimum of three scholarly resources is required.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines. It is required to be submit to turnitin.  An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. See portions of the rubric below:

Topic /Introduction: The information provided is comprehensive and provides specific information necessary to assist the audience in understanding the topic's importance.

Critical Appraisal: Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates study from a critical perspective and draws warranted, judicious, nonfallacious conclusions. Addresses all components (a-j). Information and evidence are accurate, appropriate.

Content Comprehension: Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive; definitions are clearly stated. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.

Thesis Development and Purpose: Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction: Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

Preventing disease and promoting health

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!