Skateboard Documentaries Discussion

Skateboard Documentaries Discussion

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Skateboard Documentaries Discussion

We write papers for students

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.

Get Help Now!

Documentaries (about 250 words)

 

In your post, discuss any of these items regarding the documentaries. You do not need to discuss the skateboard documentary, but you may as there are several interesting sociological aspects to that film. Ideally, you significantly and meaningfully discussed both in your feedback paper, in which case, feel free to discuss either documentary, or discuss some common themes.

Give your post a meaningful title.

1) Jack Johnson: There is much that could be written here.  Again, if you did much of your feedback paper on Jack Johnson, do one of the other two comments.  However, Jack Johnson said, “I have found no better way in avoiding race prejudice than to act with people of other races as if prejudice did not exist.”  Do you think this was a useful way for Johnson to fight racism?  Is it still a useful way to fight racism today? Can this be done?

2) There are so many interesting and frustrating aspects of the times and society surrounding Jack Johnson.  What items stuck out to you? Items to consider: Jim Crow laws, universities/colleges and work place being the primary organizers of sports teams with Blacks virtually shut out of both, evolution of boxing (introduction of gloves, rounds, etc), gambling and prohibition, Constitutional changes and the Progressive Era, The Mann Act, etc.

Alternatively, feel free to discuss meaningful themes you identified with in either documentary.

Skateboard Documentaries Discussion

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

Skateboard Documentaries Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!